“Regulatory Creep” – Legal Issues in U.S. v. Thakkar


Thom Thompson
Contributing Editor
Thursday afternoon as part of the FIA Law & Compliance Conference, Marc Nagel, attorney advisor to the derivatives training firm Exchange Analytics, moderated a panel composed of attorneys Gary DeWaal and Renato Mariotti discussing the recent federal criminal charges against computer programmer Jitesh Thakkar.
The panel was sponsored by Thompson Coburn. Mariotti, a partner at Thompson Coburn, and DeWaal, special counsel at Katten Muchin Rosenman, had a history of disagreeing about many aspects of the government’s case – the first federal spoofing case – which Mariotti, as a federal prosecutor in the Northern District of Illinois, successfully brought against Michael Coscia in 2015. DeWaal, a well known industry commentator, had expressed concerns over the years about prosecuting spoofing cases, including the one against Coscia, a commodities trader in the CME and ICE energy markets. DeWaal told the audience that he had expressed concerns at the time about the Justice Department bringing a case against Coscia since Coscia had just settled the CME and CFTC’s complaints and was accepting substantial punishments.
Given Mariotti’s and DeWaal’s history, there was obvious potential for disagreement at the session. The two came together, however, in shared worries about the case brought by the Department of Justice against Thakkar.
When Nagel introduced the panelists he also called the audience’s attention to Holly Campbell, the associate at Thompson Coburn to whom Nagel attributed much of the heavy lifting in the Thakkar proceedings.
DeWaal started off discussions by complaining about regulatory creep, the incremental expansion of jurisdictional reach, at the CFTC. The case against Thakkar was the most recent example. The government had charged Thakkar, a software vendor who was not a trader or otherwise alleged to be a direct participant, with spoofing. Mariotti later said that as the prosecutor in Coscia he had not charged the programmer who developed Coscia’s spoofing software.
DeWaal also pointed to the CFTC settlement with Deutsche Bank and one of its affiliates in a 2018 spoofing case where the Commission named as defendant the culprit subsidiary but also Deutsche Bank FCM for carrying the illegal trades. DeWaal also noted that the same regulatory creep is occurring on the securities side where the SEC, looking for someone to charge in the EtherDelta case against a decentralized crypto-token trading platform, charged the founder for setting up the platform.
DeWaal noted that at about the time the SEC announced the EtherDelta settlement, in what likely wasn’t a coincidence, CFTC Commissioner Brian Quintenz had said in a speech published on the CFTC website that the Commission may assert jurisdiction over persons who code certain kinds of smart contracts – self executing software programs – if those contracts are part of a fraudulent action.
Mariotti then described how Thakkar was found not guilty on the basis of the facts, not the law. He reviewed the pre-trial discussions and motions which forced the prosecution to abandon arguments that Thakkar should have known what Sarao, the spoofer, was up to. Also excluded was the so-called ostrich theory of culpability – the idea that Thakkar had willfully avoided finding out what the software he developed was going to be used for. Dismissal of the key conspiracy complaint was caused by Sarao’s own testimony that he did not think that Thakkar had had knowledge of Sarao’s spoofing strategies.
At any rate, both Mariotti and DeWaal are concerned about the CFTC’s determination to keep pursuing their case against Thakkar despite the dismissal of the Justice Department’s case as well as the judge’s characterization of the government’s evidence as “thin.” DeWaal also believes that the CFTC will continue charging third parties in spoofing cases unless and until they get stopped by a court.
In response to Nagel’s request for “take-aways” the panelists said there were some positive results from the CFTC’s actions. Firms are much more conscious about program designs. Their contracts with third party service providers are much more thoughtfully drafted. Managements are paying closer attention to algo design, and internal technology review committees are being taken more seriously. Noting that surveillance is important, DeWaal said that trading firms and their brokers had to watch out for patterns.
Nagel asked if the panelist thought that there was anything out there that we don’t know about from the enforcement side. Both Mariotti and DeWaal agreed that there are third party liability issues out there that haven’t been considered yet. As DeWaal stated, “There are always issues out there.”
John Lothian Newsletter
Today's Newsletter

Gold Bars and Tokyo Apartments: How Money Is Flowing Out of China
First Read Hits & Takes John Lothian & JLN Staff Today is GivingTuesday. According to the official GivingTuesday website, "GivingTuesday was created in 2012 as a simple idea: a day that encourages people to do good." I encourage you to make a donation to your...
We visit more than 100 websites daily for financial news (Would YOU do that?)
Now Read This
Eventus CEO Travis Schwab Highlights Growth and Innovation at FIA EXPO 2023
At FIA EXPO 2023 in Chicago, John Lothian News caught up with Eventus CEO Travis Schwab to discuss the company’s latest developments and industry insights. Schwab shared the significance of extending Eventus’s relationship with Philip Capital, emphasizing the growth in the Asia-Pacific region and validating the strength of their partnership.
Schwab revealed that the new user interface (UI) of its Validus platform is gaining traction with clients. The platform, designed to streamline workflow, allows users to efficiently work through complex issues, investigate alerts, and remedy them with greater ease and speed. With the first clients already on board, Schwab said he anticipates this platform will significantly enhance scalability, performance, and usability.
Former CFTC Commissioner Dawn Stump Discusses Crypto, Carbon Markets, and the Future of Trading at FIA EXPO 2023
At FIA EXPO 2023, John Lothian News interviewed former CFTC Commissioner Dawn Stump, the head of Stump Strategic. In the sit-down, Stump was probed on several critical matters central to the futures industry and the larger financial landscape.
The notable lack of cryptocurrency discussions in the conference’s schedule and presence in the exhibit space didn’t go unnoticed. Stump was directly questioned about her perspective on the current condition of the crypto world, especially as the industry is looking at potential regulatory changes influencing the trajectory of digital assets.
ICE’s Chris Edmonds Expands on Crypto Commentary in JLN Video Interview
Last Friday John Lothian News interviewed ICE Chief Development Officer Chris Edmonds about the commentary he wrote that JLN published and why he wrote it and what he was trying to accomplish.
We asked him what lessons were learned from the BAKKT experience and what was ICE trying to accomplish with the exchange and clearing offering and what didn’t work?
Edmonds said the lesson learned was that the market did not want a physically delivered bitcoin contract.
Eurex’s Rafael Zanatta Talks About New Bitcoin Index Futures with JLN’s Julie Ros at FIA’s IDX
Rafael Zanatta, head of sales, EMEA, Eurex FTSE bitcoin index futures at Eurex, spoke with JLN Correspondent Julie Ros at the FIA’s International Derivatives Week (IDX) in June about Eurex’s recently launched FTSE bitcoin index futures.